News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 High-rises haunt St George 

High-rises haunt St George

07 Feb, 2012 03:00 PM
FEAR that high rise development will be forced on St George suburbs has risen another notch after the state government's recent proposal to bypass councils and let developers choose sites to be rezoned for bulk housing.

Hurstville and Rockdale councils criticised the move but Kogarah Council declined to comment.

The government, has invited landowners to nominate land suitable for housing and has established a committee to assess proposals.

While none of the sites nominated so far are in St George, there is fear that this will change.

Hurstville and Rockdale Councils said planning controls belonged with the community which was most affected by planning decisions.

"The community elected us (councillors) to represent their interests and not have the NSW government swoop in and force council to approve developments in inappropriate areas," Hurstville mayor Steve McMahon said.

Hurstville Council already has a legal battle on its hands over a proposed development in Treacy Street whose concept plan was approved last year by the NSW Planning Assessment Commission despite it being inconsistent with the council's planning controls.

Cr McMahon said there were other sites in the Hurstville area which could appeal to developers, such as Hurstville Central which now had a two storey limit.

"Once they start building high rises over one railway station what's to save the others such as Riverwood, Penshurst and Oatley," he said.

"If anyone tried to build over Oatley Station World War III would break out."

Cr McMahon said Hurstville had a long-term plan in place to meet the housing target outlined in the draft South Subregional Strategy which did not impact on the suburbs.

"Council has worked hard to develop planning controls that allow for growth in Hurstville CBD. High density housing has no place in our local suburbs."

Rockdale mayor Bill Saravinovski said it was another backflip by NSW Liberal Party that gave a win to developers.

"The election promise they made was to give the powers back to local government," Cr Saravinovski said.

"The community should decide what they want and should be in surrounding areas."

Should developers be allowed to choose sites to be rezoned?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
With the law as it stands now with "in the public good" clause, it'll be open slather for developers to maximize high-rise housing/in their pocket profits.

Home owners can have their property compulsorily acquired for the "public good"!

It has already started with the South West rail corridor, with a 20% discount for good measure in the compensation paid.


Posted by Ray Van, 8/02/2012 6:40:04 AM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
This kind of development has to be planned in a way that will be beneficial to the community in another 50 years down the track. This means that these developments must be environmentally sustainable
Posted by andrewc, 8/02/2012 10:10:38 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
Bullseye AndrewC! You hit the nail on the head!
Posted by Dennis, 9/02/2012 10:06:46 AM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Rezoning debate: Hurstville Central is a site which could appeal to developers.
Rezoning debate: Hurstville Central is a site which could appeal to developers.

Most popular articles


click here
 
Homeshow 180512 skyscraper 3
 
Jeep Raffle 180512 Skyscraper 4
 
Design an ad 070512 skyscraper 5


St George & Sutherland Shire Leader







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...