News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Sutherland Shire levy 

Sutherland Shire levy

21 Jan, 2010 03:00 AM
SUTHERLAND Shire mayor Lorraine Kelly has warned residents to prepare for cuts in council services and facilities if the proposed 6 per cent levy on rates is rejected.

Cr Kelly also acknowledged the personal risk in leading the push for the increase, which would apply for the next five years.

"My head is on the chopping block, and so is that of every other councillor who has supported this, but I am doing it because I am passionate about the shire,'' she said.

"If you look around, shire people like good infrastructure and good services.

"If there was any other solution I would do it, but I have gone through everything and I feel this is the best solution for our community.''

Cr Kelly encouraged residents to have their say before the January 29 deadline.

The response will determine whether the council seeks State Government approval for the increase.

Cr Kelly said about 1350 responses had been received, but progress results could not be given because it would undermine the process.

However, the feedback had revealed the existence of several "myths'', she said.

They included that the council had lost money through investments during the global financial crisis, that it had mismanaged its spending, spent too much on administration and overseas travel and that, once in place, the levy would become permanent.

While Cr Kelly denied these claims, Cronulla MP Malcolm Kerr, who is one of the main opponents of the levy, said they were true.

Mr Kerr also said council literature continued to confuse ratepayers by suggesting the levy was for just one year.

The mayor should be offering ratepayers "solutions not ultimatums'', he said.

Cr Kelly reiterated that the levy would be spent on "ageing infrastructure'' and would include renovating or rebuilding all public toilets during the next three years.

"If ratepayers don't support the levy, council will have to look at cutting its services and facilities and we will all feel the consequences through a decline in the quality of our roads, footpaths, toilets, playgrounds, parks and other council-provided facilities,'' she said.

Cr Kelly has been phoning residents who returned forms expressing concerns.

"Pensioners are saying they are on a fixed income and doing it tough, especially with state increases like energy and water,'' she said.

"I appreciate that, but I am trying to put the point that the council is also getting those increases, and we have absorbed them since 1996.''

Cr Kelly said the council's financial plight was documented five years ago.

"Maybe a previous mayor should have bitten the bullet and made the strong decision but they didn't and it has left to me to try and sort it out,'' she added.

THE LEVY

YOUR CHOICE

* The proposed levy will be 6 per cent of next year's rates.

* This amount will be added to rates for five years.

* It will be used to improve infrastructure, including roads, toilets and sports fields.

* The council needs the support of ratepayers before it can seek State Government approval for the increase.

Click on the comment link below to have your say.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
yes 'solutions not ultimatums' I don't like being threatened. When's the next council elections?
Posted by concerned, 21/01/2010 10:59:00 AM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
The Mayor should provide before/after Council investment details if her claims are to believed. Any above par rate increases for basic infrastructure are unacceptable until Council cuts out extravagant expenditure such as : pieces of art such as the metal monument to nothing at the end of the walkway from the station to South Cronulla beach; unwanted and unnecessary skate parks at Cronulla; and forums arranged to resolve "greenhouse effects", "warming of the globe", "climate change "(which fortuitously also explains the cooling of the globe).There are many other examples which other ratepayers could add. We need "back to the basics" action to fix infrastructure problems and to defer the trendy stuff until they can afford it. Council also needs to bite the bullet and accept past mistakes and try to permanently fix them rather than continue to throw money at lost causes. The most prominent is the Cronulla ocean pool, the wrong type of pool in the wrong place. Blind freddy can see that this pool would only be successful at the protected southern end. It is time to plan for that and the conversion of the existing pool to a self flushing rock pool.Can we have a forum on this?
Posted by John, 21/01/2010 12:54:17 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
Solutions and not ultimatums is exactly right. I don't like to be threatened either. Maybe the council should stop pulling roads up in the shire that have absolutely nothing wrong with them. And it would be nice to see the before/after council investments for the public to believe the council
Posted by MartiC, 21/01/2010 1:37:34 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
This is a tax. It is estimated that Council Rates will increase next year, whether it is called a levy or a tax, by 9.5%. I will not be supporting this tax hike. Council should provide the residents with its core responsibilities and reduce discretionary spending in areas which are not its responsibility.
Posted by Councillor Kent Johns, 21/01/2010 2:12:16 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
This is typical of Sutherland Shire Council. Couldn't run a chook raffle in a fowl yard. The Mayor talks about services...what services? This council has downgraded services and not invested in infrastructure for many years...look at the state of our playing fields!!!
Posted by CD, 21/01/2010 8:14:00 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
"If ratepayers don't support the levy, council will have to look at cutting its services and facilities and we will all feel the consequences through a decline in the quality of our roads, footpaths, toilets, playgrounds, parks and other council-provided facilities,'' she said. So cut the services and facilities! But have a real assessment of these costs first. Roads and footpaths aren't the greatest anyway, have a look at Randwick councils if you want to see how low you can go. Most shire toilets are locked and unaccessible. Playgrounds are more often than not under-utilised, Why?. Parks are either overgrown or great - depends on when they are maintained. Assess the gardening methods and utilisation of staff and equipment, spraying glyphosate is not gardening, dozing in the truck is not gardening. Manage the council with at least some semblance of innovation instead of just deciding to chuck more money at it's ineptness. Every $1.00 saved by council is worth far more than any earned through an applied levy.
Posted by charles, 21/01/2010 8:14:32 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
We don't get value for our rates now. Typical Public Service bureaucrats thinking if it doesn't work now then we throw more money at it rather than look at internal processes and wastes of time and effort. How many rort overseas "education trips" have our repesentatives been on since the last election? How many conferenceswith all expenses paid ? We are overgoverned. It's so bad I can't decide wheter I want to get rid of the State or Council. Just have 2 tiers and we save a fortune straight away. THIS IS ANOTHER FORM OF TAX AND WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE STUCK WITH IT. HOPELESS ADMINISTRATIVE SKILS NOT ONLY BY OUR REPS BUT BY THE STAFF WE EMPLOY.
Posted by Pythagoras, 22/01/2010 8:13:22 AM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
Sutherland Council and many other areas both government and private need to be more long term productive. They need to understand that when you you build something IT HAS TO BE LOOKED AFTER. The problem is we have LOST the work level to do this work ( Sub-Professional). They had a basic understanding of the theory and they knew the basics trade area also plus they had the understanding and experience to pull it all together. You cannot have just two levels the top theory and the trades level. IT JUST DOES NOT WORK. IT WILL COST MORE IN THE LONG TERM by the excess waste that does occur. Does the council really know the FUTURE COST's it needs. NO. It acts only when it has to. It waste's a lot. Council needs a PROACTIVE APPROACH where it manages all of its assets and identify future problems and attend to them before they are actual problems. e.g. Bush fire protection. Why are fires more of a problem today than 30-40 years ago. Well then people cleared back from their properties, so there was a fire barrier. The above shows the process procedure that needs to be done. The council just can't proactively rebuild toilets if needed or NOT.
Posted by Grahame, 22/01/2010 10:05:05 AM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
Whether this increase is called a levy or a tax, it is still an extra cost to us, the ratepayers (and voters). I am certain that the Council must be feeling the strain with greater costs and the need for more income...........just like us! However, we cannot simply demand more money from our employers, but rather we have to manage our costs and reduce our expenditure on non-necessary items and areas of waste. Perhaps this is what the Council should be doing..........just like the rest of us! So, rather than cutting standard and essential services, rather than threatening us with sub-standard services and facilities, how about cutting waste and being more responsible with the funds that we entrust to our elected officials? The Council needs to be aware that the ratepayers should not be treated as "whipping boys", or as a "bottomless pit" of funds to just dip into whenever the public "piggy bank" starts to get low. Rather, the ratepayers (who happen also to be voters) want considerably better (and more transparent) fiscal management of our public purse. Care should be exercised by the Council, lest the "whipping boys" decide to fight back at the ballot-box!
Posted by Tony G, 22/01/2010 3:53:56 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
Councillor johns says "Council should provide the residents with its core responsibilities and reduce discretionary spending in areas which are not its responsibility" Can he tell us which present council services he will cut and which council employees will lose their jobs ???
Posted by Ian Nicholson, 24/01/2010 4:46:49 PM, on St George & Sutherland Shire Leader
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
 Upgrade needed: Cr Kelly near public toilets at Cronulla Beach, which would be renovated or rebuilt if the levy is approved.. Picture: Lisa McMahon
Upgrade needed: Cr Kelly near public toilets at Cronulla Beach, which would be renovated or rebuilt if the levy is approved.. Picture: Lisa McMahon
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Sutherland Shire Council go ahead with its proposed rates levy?

Yes
(43.7%)

No
(56.3%)

Total Votes: 522
Poll Date: 20 January, 2010

Most popular articles


Early entry
 
Win $500 for your sports team thanks to McDonald's
 
TVS Channel 44
 
Help us raise $750,000 for Medical Research


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...