The decision not to enable First Peoples to have a greater say in government decisions impacting on their families and communities runs the risk of further disempowering them.
Create a free account to read this article
or signup to continue reading
Catholic social teaching principles, which are a guiding light for the Society, note that a yardstick by which to tell whether justice is effectively present in a given situation is to ask: Is real responsibility being exercised by the people most affected by the decisions that are being made? Are they allowed to share in the decision-making?
A constitutional Voice would have enabled Australia's First Peoples to have much greater input to governmental decisions that affect them.
A lot of commentary in the lead-up to voting caused us, one of the many faith-based bodies advocating for Yes, concern. The Voice would have provided a properly constituted and well-structured way of influencing policy and improving outcomes where they matter - in the daily lives of the almost one million Australians of First Nations heritage.
No would not mean eliminating the gaps in mortality and morbidity rates between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. It would not mean an end to young Aboriginal kids going to jail or falling behind in their education. But these are among the goals we should work for.'
We can only hope and pray that the Albanese Government will put even greater effort into developing ways for First Nations people to provide meaningful input into the development of policies that impact on their wellbeing and advancement, even without a formal Voice process.
As one door closes, another often opens, and this decision could provide a strong incentive for the Australian Government to enact and implement policies that are informed by what is best for the original inhabitants of this land.
The Society has long-standing connections with the First Peoples of Australia, and we are well acquainted with the disadvantage they continue to experience. Depending on the location, between ten and twenty per cent of all people assisted by the Society identify as being Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.
We understand their pain and know there have been few significant improvements in their socio-economic conditions over the decades, despite changes of governments and policies.
Our position on the Voice referendum was based on the values of our founders who two centuries ago showed courageous advocacy on behalf of the vulnerable, the powerless and the many others who needed not just a loaf of bread, but equality under the law.'
St Vincent de Paul Society national president, Mark Gaetani
Where to now?
The current indigenous leaders need to consider their positions. Next, forget the wishful thinking, the theoretical, what happened in 1788, reconciliation, recognition, the Uluru statement - dump all of it!
Concentrate solely on raising the living standards and life opportunities of indigenous peoples. Make peace with Jacinta Price, Warren Mundine, Lidia Thorpe and run with new strategies - ditto Peter Dutton - he needs a lot of the 39 per cent who voted yes if he is to win the next election - negotiate with him. See if you can get independent Indigenous candidates into the Senate in NSW and Victoria at the next election and just possibly into lower house seats in inner Sydney and Melbourne. That means real power not just a Voice!
